The Emergence of Chess as a Representation of the Cultural Space of Ancient India
Georgy Pilavov
The study examines the cultural and socio-political features of the ancient Indian civilization that led to the emergence of chaturanga (the original version of chess) in India during the Gupta Empire. The methodological basis of the research is the explication of the studied issues through comparative historical analysis. Since chess, being a cultural phenomenon, refl ects socio-cultural and socio-political realities at all stages of its development, therefore, their appearance should be due to similar reasons. What distinguishes chaturanga from other ancient games (latrunkuli, petteyi, senet) is that it was attended by not two, but four competitors, which refl ects the political fragmentation of India, which, throughout almost the entire history, has been a number of independent states. In addition, in ancient board games, the chips were the same, and only in chaturanga was there a variety of shapes. The presence in the original version of chess of various pieces with different possibilities, as well as the absence of a rule for turning a pawn into any piece, is a demonstration of the Indian caste system, which is characterized by the absence of social elevators. Chaturanga also refl ected the religious realities of that era. In particular, a number of Buddhist concepts have been embodied on the chessboard. The principle of the infi nity of worlds is refl ected in the infi nite number of possible chess games, the concept of samsara is conveyed by the return of captured (killed) pieces to the board. The chessboard itself was called ashtapada in India and meant a numerical magical symbol used in Buddhism, and the clockwise turn is a reference to the wheel of dharma. The most striking projection of Buddhism on the chess space is the use of dice in chaturanga to determine the turn of the move, embodying the principle of karma on the chessboard. The obvious shortcomings of chaturanga, in particular, the element of randomness in casting lots, could not be corrected by Indian thinkers and chess players, since after the collapse of the Gupta Empire, scientifi c and philosophical thought in India was stagnating.